-
As far as I can tell, this library currently has no support for the newer SCRAM-SHA-256 authentication method, which is more secure than MD5. Are there any plans to support this?
-
Ready for SCRAM-SHA-256 (and more)?
-
[RFC 7616](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7616) from September 2015 about HTTP Digest Access Authentication adds support for two new algorithms, SHA2-256 as mandatory and SHA2-512/256 as a backup, and…
-
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802…
-
##### SUMMARY
Somehow when using ~contype hostnossl is being translated to hostssl...~ different lines of configuration but using the same user, it will overwrite the lines already changed and it wi…
-
Since SHA1 is known to be vulnerable to collision attacks, tsdfx should switch to either SHA-256 or SHA-3 (preferably the latter, since SHA-256 is also a Merkle-Damgård hash and should therefore be as…
-
Dear @RainLoop team,
There is a big security problem, the missing support of SCRAM-SHA-*.
Can you add supports of :
- SCRAM-SHA-1
- SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-256
- SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
- S…
-
The IRCv3 working group now recommends SCRAM-SHA-256 as SASL authentication mechanism. We also set up a service which has SCRAM-SHA-256 as the primary mechanism. Could you implement it too? It should …
-
fiwalk has the ability to calculate MD5 and SHA-1 hashes. We should add the ability to calculate SHA-256 and SHA-3 as well.
-
Please fill out the form below before submitting, thank you!
- [x] Bug exists Release Version 1.1.1 ( Master Branch)
- [ ] Bug exists in Snapshot Version 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT (Develop Branch)
I'm try…
Pitel updated
2 years ago