-
Hi!
Our company is currently performing a legal audit of our engineering / technology department and chai-as-promised was flagged as problematic open source dependency due to the WTFPL license.
…
-
Neither the Readme nor any of the code mentions license information. Popular licenses in the Ruby community are the [MIT](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License), the [LGPL](http://en.wikipedia.org/…
-
The Linux installation script from the wiki fails horribly. I have created an updated one here: https://gist.github.com/masterofjellyfish/c06129e2d6c0857823f5
consider it WTFPL, I don't really care. …
-
Think of the licence.
Idea: Use dual licence EPL & LGPL (v3)
-
Será posible liberar bajo alguna licencia permisiva ([BSD](https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause) /[MIT](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT) / [WTFPL](http://www.wtfpl.net/)? ) el proceso ETL …
-
@domenic Hello! A lot of corporations are taking a strong stance against use of open source with a WTFPL license (mine included :/ ) so I wanted to get your thoughts on updating it to MIT, a permiss…
-
I am looking to create a PIP package for this lib so I can reference it from my sample applications project. @steeve do you have experience creating packages? Or should I figure it out?
What license…
-
Could you add a license file to the project? Just to be able to refer to something in case sombody nit-picks.
-
Instead of having a license markdown file in every project, one could for example use --source-code-license=http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.en.html --documentation-license=http://www.wtfpl.net/tx…
-
This repository has no LICENSE file and many/all files lack license headers.
Please add them if possible.