-
This needs #4 .
- [x] For a reconstructed non-parametric WFE, check out the energy as a distribution of Zernikes up to index `k`. Then see the energy that is left when the WFE was decomposed over t…
-
We have created some PSF simulations to test PIFF and PSFEx. I can give more details as needed, but in brief these are using galsim with
- realistic star flux and S/N distributions based on DES, with…
-
I have a doubt about the inputs/outputs of the software. When I write:
```
x = np.linspace(-1,1,101)
evaluator = orthopy.c1.legendre.Eval(x, "classical")
for _ in range(5):
print(next(evalua…
-
Hello,
I found the following lines of documentation in the code while looking for a way to do a minimal working example.
```python
"""
... line 38
Examples
--------
>>> import ceo
…
-
It should give a matrix for a given `diameter` and a given `polynomial_order` .
It is not a priority but it would be nice to be independent of the 200Mb 3D matrix containing the Zernike maps passed…
-
Aaron Roodman has warned us for years that our `OpticalPSF` class doesn't match what Zemax predicts. This issue is to take a deep dive and figure out exactly what coordinate system conventions we and…
-
Hello,
This is an incredibly promising package, bravo for all the work!
I've installed the current development branch (0.19.2.dev129) which I later on discovered is quite different from the stable…
-
Hi Brandon,
This is somehow a follow-up to issue https://github.com/brandondube/prysm/issues/38 but I thought it'd be better to have a dedicated write-up for clarity and conciseness (and future ref…
-
Hello,
I discovered an apparent issue in the Zernike RMS normalization for the m = 0 terms.
The source material (http://wp.optics.arizona.edu/jcwyant/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/08/Zernike…
-
Try out if we can add an additive non-parametric layer to the OPD.
Later we could see if it is worth to add a non-parametric layer at the pixel level so that it can cope with effects happening at …