-
# Issue:
I want to highlight that the use of protobuf3 beta 2 library it's not contemplated in common distros cause of beta quality of the library. Instead protobuf 2.x is used.
The python2-protobuf…
-
If no one wants to pick them up, they will be removed in 2016.11
-
Will electrum migrate/support Python3? What stops this process?
If I provide pull request on this issue, is there any chance that it will be accepted?
I've applied 2to3 script + few patches in code,…
asfin updated
7 years ago
-
As reported by @shivramsrivastava in #50:
We are getting this following error after we refreshed our branch with the latest changes we are getting a SIGSEGV.
```
#0 0x00000000007688ea in google::pr…
ms705 updated
8 years ago
-
Win10
Python 2.7.12
pip 8.1.1
node v6.9.4
npm 3.10.10
Worked fine yesterday but as of today I started to receive almost solely empty results after about 1 hour of correct scanning. Restarting s…
-
In protobuf3 all plain fields are optional. This generates a lot of has_\* fields, which is not desirable in resource constraint environments such as microcontrollers. A way to suppress, or limit, the…
-
There have been quite a lot of requests for static code generation in the past. Personally, I'd not absolutely require it with v6's built-in codegen, but there certainly are valid use cases where havi…
-
_From @adriancole on April 30, 2016 0:50_
Those writing instrumentation on the JVM have fairly undifferentiated tasks, putting spans on a transport for collection. For example, code in htrace, brave …
-
Multiple reports on discord of people receiving this error:
2017-03-11 19:42:27,730 [ search-worker-38][ search][ ERROR] Map parse failed at -xyz, abandoning location. dummyaccount ma…
-
Hi, I'm just wondering why protobuf version 3 is needed to build LibreVault.
Is it because version 3.0 has some feature that librevault needs?
Or could it be done with protobuf 2.6 as well?
The reas…
Strit updated
8 years ago