-
Since the OOP features were added in Fortran 2003 and later standards, I suggest removing the `fortran90` tag and perhaps adding `fortran2003`, `modern-fortran`, and `oop`
-
@everythingfunctional wrote in https://github.com/j3-fortran/fortran_proposals/issues/56#issuecomment-602876857 and I am moving it to a separate issue here:
> As a side note, what's the community c…
-
Hi, I am a beginner who is learning how to read and write a netcdf file with Fortran 90. I got some problems. Could someone help me?
* I have installed ''_netcdf-fortran_'' through **conda**.
(h…
-
標準出力はwrite文ではなく、print文を使用する。
-
**Originally by _gropp_ on 2012-03-07 09:43:17 -0600**
---
I ran the code checker over the current version of the MPI-3 standard. Attached are my recommended fixes for the topology chapter.
This sh…
-
I have installed the packaged version of NetCDF for Fortran, but CMake does not correctly find it.
```
$ cmake .
...
-- Failed to find NetCDF interface for F90
-- Could NOT find NetCDF (missing: Net…
-
# Description
Beautification does not appear to work for Fortran despite installing GNU emacs as suggested.
Files saved in '.f' format.
Beautification works perfectly for python scripts.
…
-
Problem
-----------
Currently `real` are by definition floating point values. So when assigning constants to a double precision you'll get conversion losses
```fortran
program test
real(8), p…
-
Dear OptimPack maintainers,
This is Dr. Zaikun Zhang from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Together with Professor [N.I.M. Gould](https://www.numerical.rl.ac.uk/people/nimg/), I am responsible…
-
The callbacks for this bindings are implemented in an ad hoc fashion, with the primary aim to closely match the NLopt API in a Fortran-friendly way. However, this might not be the best/only way to def…