-
Firstly, thank you for crate!
I'm not closely familiar with tooling for working with RDF/OWL, so it would be nice to have at least a couple of examples on how to work with a graph from RDF Ontology…
-
* /observationPeriod should have been included with the stats vocabulary from #2564, based on the datacommons [deployment](https://datacommons.org/browser/observationPeriod).
* /courseLength was th…
-
update Schema.org Country Code to match the definition that is being added in #282
-
Editorial slip on my part, in https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/2722
startOffset was supposed to be expected on this type.
-
You have buried the link to OpenDomain
Please put in footer like https://xmpp.org/
See
https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/116
-
Issue Description:
**Proposal:**
Currently, Schema.org provides a robust framework for marking up various types of content on the web, but there is a gap in specifying the suitability of content f…
-
Schema.org datatypes are not good:
- they go against standard XSD datatypes that are the foundation of both XML and RDF.
- they are tentative (don't specify a lexical representation), eg schema:Numb…
-
This is a continuation of schemaorg/schemaorg#1743 , itself a continuation of the initial proposal schemaorg/schemaorg#1156 that led to the introduction of the type [Legislation](http://schema.org/Leg…
-
As discussed in https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1715.
A possibly useful feature for ShEx would be to have a more consistent way to define constraint weight annotations for e.g.
> "s…
-
Previously:
* https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/2435
* https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/2919
Noting that Dublin Core [have](https://www.dublincore.org/specifications…