-
`staticcheck` already supports go 1.18, but review dog doesn't
Is there a release on the way?
-
### Verification
- [X] I understand that [if I ignore these instructions, my issue may be closed without review](https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/blob/master/doc/faq/closing_issues_without_r…
-
Currently most of the reviewdog actions (noticed it with yamllint) don't look at files in templating, probably due to the .j2 extension.
This is a bit annoying, because these are then applied to th…
-
### Is this feature missing in the latest version?
- [X] I'm using the latest release
### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I've implemented the github action in a proj…
-
# Code Scanning
> I want security code scanning
> so that my resulting component project has
> - a security scanning start offered
> - a sensible default scan coverage
> - a placeholder of goo…
-
* https://github.com/reviewdog/action-tfsec/blob/d369687c2fd9373b8469e34602a714b24b78b0d3/script.sh#L72-L74
* https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog#reviewdog-diagnostic-format-rdformat
-
The workflow reviewdog.yml is referencing action actions/checkout using references v1. However this reference is missing the commit [a6747255bd19d7a757dbdda8c654a9f84db19839](https://github.com/action…
-
## Background
As an engineer, I wish code that introduces new errors to be blocked from merging, so that I do not inadvertently introduce regressions to production that cause WSODs for editors.
…
-
Hello! I've configured this action for a project and we are adding checks slowly. For example, we check for W605 on the whole project:
```
- name: flake8 W605 on project
uses: reviewdog/act…
-
Trying to get setup with a basic configuration and the Action fails with:
![](https://files.pbrisbin.com/screenshots/screenshot.728083.png)
Is this an issue on my end?
Our config:
```yaml
…