-
TAXII 2.0 references [RFC 7159](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7159) for JSON. It was obsoleted by [RFC 8259](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8259)
TAXII 2.1 should reference RFC 8259. Additionally,…
-
Good afternoon,
I was going through all data I collected with this function https://github.com/Cyb3rWard0g/ATTACK-Python-Client/blob/master/attackcti/attack_api.py#L177 and I noticed that there wer…
-
We need to add clarifying text to TAXII 2.1 about not using TLS 1.3 0-rtt. I would suggest we use the following text. "Implementations MUST NOT use TLS 1.3 0-rtt for TAXII". The reason for this is …
-
In the spec we defined two headers `X-TAXII-Date-Added-First` and `X-TAXII-Date-Added-Last`. My question is, should this be the time the object was added to the server or the time it was added to the…
-
Proposed changes in 2.1 to "1.5.7 Content Negotiation" seek to add a `version` parameter to the STIX and TAXII media types. If these changes go in, we should make the `versions` field in `api-root` …
-
The Status Resource provides detailed information for failures via a list of status-failure type which contains:
- **_id_** - The identifier of the object that failed to be created. For STIX objects …
-
Hi everyone,
I am pretty new to the `conpot` and `hpfriends` log sharing system, but I was unable to find a very good place to get full information. The `http://hpfriends.honeycloud.net/` was not r…
-
I don't see where we require a Content-Type HTTP header on POST requests. We should.
-
Is it possible to push more than one file content to the collection in a single command, like [ taxii-push --path http://ip.address:port/services/inbox --content-file * --dest collection ]? I tried th…
-
From Emmanuelle:
We have noticed additional areas that may require changes (highlighted in bold),
Remove the “modified” property from all marking-definition objects since versioning markings di…