-
I dont know if you changed your mind about it or if it is a bug. But currently, language fam is fertile north of the arctic homeband and south of the desert homeband.
From: https://onehouronelife…
-
WORKFLOW DOC
{FOR REVIEWERS}
- [x] They can run the code smoothly on the reviewer's end, where the microdata could be generated without error
- [ ] Review and validate the quality checking output…
-
Depending on the plant, there are different thresholds for the received values.
Need to find out which they are and display them accordingly.
-
WORKFLOW DOC
{FOR REVIEWERS}
- [ ] They can run the code smoothly on the reviewer's end, where the microdata could be generated without error
- [ ] Review and validate the quality checking output…
-
WORKFLOW DOC
{FOR REVIEWERS}
- [ ] They can run the code smoothly on the reviewer's end, where the microdata could be generated without error
- [ ] Review and validate the quality checking output…
-
Should this library be moving towards a more pep8-friendly naming convention?
For example, rename (`flatlib.ephem.swe.`)`lunarEclipseGlobal` to `lunar_eclipse_global`, and add `lunarEclipseGlobal =…
-
-
WORKFLOW DOC
{FOR REVIEWERS}
- [x] They can run the code smoothly on the reviewer's end, where the microdata could be generated without error
- [x] Review and validate the quality checking output…
-
WORKFLOW DOC
{FOR REVIEWERS}
- [ ] They can run the code smoothly on the reviewer's end, where the microdata could be generated without error
- [ ] Review and validate the quality checking output…
-
WORKFLOW DOC
{FOR REVIEWERS}
- [x] They can run the code smoothly on the reviewer's end, where the microdata could be generated without error
- [x] Review and validate the quality checking output…