-
```
There seems to be an incompatibility issue between powermock and JaCoCo,
possibly related to JDK 7.
Attached is a small maven project which can be executed using "mvn clean
verify" to showcase …
-
```
Since Mockito 1.8.1 the CGLibHacker is a member of MethodInterceptorFilter
which means that the workaround in performIntercept can be removed (if we
change the CGLibHacker member instance in
org.m…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
I am using the following code:
1) Class Debugger for which I would like to mock static void methods
package uk.ac.open.util;
public class Debugger {
pu…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
I am using the following code:
1) Class Debugger for which I would like to mock static void methods
package uk.ac.open.util;
public class Debugger {
pu…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
I am using the following code:
1) Class Debugger for which I would like to mock static void methods
package uk.ac.open.util;
public class Debugger {
pu…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
I am using the following code:
1) Class Debugger for which I would like to mock static void methods
package uk.ac.open.util;
public class Debugger {
pu…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
I am using the following code:
1) Class Debugger for which I would like to mock static void methods
package uk.ac.open.util;
public class Debugger {
pu…
-
```
Since Mockito 1.8.1 the CGLibHacker is a member of MethodInterceptorFilter
which means that the workaround in performIntercept can be removed (if we
change the CGLibHacker member instance in
org.m…
-
pom.xml depdendencies
```
org.powermock
powermock-module-junit4
2.0.9
test
org.powermock
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Preparing a class @PrepareForTest(PluginServiceCallbacks.class)
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expect it to prepare without excepti…