-
Hello,
on LinuxMint 18.1 with all updates I get these build errors:
/home/linux/nbfc/NoteBookFanControl.sln (Build) ->
(Build target) ->
/home/linux/nbfc/Tests/StagWare.FanControl.Tests/StagWare…
-
Next code `nameof.full(state => IState.optionalField!.anotherField)` generates the string `'optionalField!.anotherField'`.
Probably, the `!` operator should be omitted
syxov updated
7 years ago
-
What is the status ReaderWriterState in the Type Classes rewrite? Was support eliminated in 8cff584, or is it now just a special case of stacked monads that Transformers can handle? I ask because I …
-
For example
``` cs
var a = nameof(x);
```
the `IVariableDeclaration` operation has a `None` operation as `InitialValue`.
genlu updated
7 years ago
-
https://twitter.com/#!/davetchepak/statuses/73686872353812481
.ShouldBeSameAs() for reference equality (Object.ReferenceEquals(a, b))
Also with equivalent ShouldNotBeSameAs
-
In my view, C#/WPF is the magic combo promoted by Microsoft. These are designed to work hand in hand and should support each-other optimally in a MVVM world. And I must say I'm pretty convinced by th…
-
```
2017-10-07 05:40:18|ArchiSteamFarm-9864|INFO|nany40|OnDisconnected() Disconnected from Steam!
2017-10-07 05:40:18|ArchiSteamFarm-9864|INFO|nany40|OnDisconnected() Reconnecting...
2017-10-07 05:…
-
Adding 'this.' does not produce compiler error but it feels wrong to have it in this case. If qualification is really necessary then we should use '<class name>.' instead.
-
-
### Description
With the addition of FSharp.Reflection, it is very easy to create dynamic form applications. Adding a simpler version of nameof would make it even easier and less error prone.
##…