-
```
There isn't any reason we should require OARC to do it. We have the data
already.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `helixblue` on 7 Jun 2010 at 5:57
-
```
There isn't any reason we should require OARC to do it. We have the data
already.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `helixblue` on 7 Jun 2010 at 5:57
-
```
There isn't any reason we should require OARC to do it. We have the data
already.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `helixblue` on 7 Jun 2010 at 5:57
-
```
There isn't any reason we should require OARC to do it. We have the data
already.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `helixblue` on 7 Jun 2010 at 5:57
-
```
There isn't any reason we should require OARC to do it. We have the data
already.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `helixblue` on 7 Jun 2010 at 5:57
-
```
There isn't any reason we should require OARC to do it. We have the data
already.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `helixblue` on 7 Jun 2010 at 5:57
-
```
There isn't any reason we should require OARC to do it. We have the data
already.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `helixblue` on 7 Jun 2010 at 5:57
-
```
There isn't any reason we should require OARC to do it. We have the data
already.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `helixblue` on 7 Jun 2010 at 5:57
-
```
There isn't any reason we should require OARC to do it. We have the data
already.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `helixblue` on 7 Jun 2010 at 5:57
-
```
There isn't any reason we should require OARC to do it. We have the data
already.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `helixblue` on 7 Jun 2010 at 5:57