-
**Describe the bug**
The addition of parameters in `Simulator::onFileClose` do not get persisted into the on-disk RunHeader since we only modify a local copy of the RunHeader instead of modifying the…
-
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Maybe not related but my compilation takes a while and I see all these all detectors "builds" take upto 24% of the compilation pro…
tvami updated
3 months ago
-
**Describe alternatives you've considered**
Add a new v14lyso branch that contains geometric descriptions of active LYSO target in constants.gdml and target.gdml
-
While writing https://ldmx-software.github.io/analysis/ldmx-sw.html I realized that it is relatively easy to write a stand-alone, single-file analyzer (or producer for that matter) due to our library …
-
I'm making this issue so we can have the discussions regarding whether or not to move away from submodules in a persistent place (as opposed to slack 😄).
Summarizing the discussion on Slack briefly…
-
Hi TS devs!
I've been running large-scale comparisons to validate my own developments, and I've noticed a (small) issue that should hopefully be easy to rectify. In your digi-producer, you use your…
-
-
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Given that we will potentially have a run in 2025 summer, we should have the expected reduced detector simulated in ldmx-sw
**D…
tvami updated
5 months ago
-
## Issue description
For 2025 test running we are considering to have a reduced LDMX. In order to study the physics capabilities of the ECAL with reduced layers we need to have changes in the GDML de…
tvami updated
6 months ago
-
This comes from https://github.com/LDMX-Software/LDCS/pull/21
When you don't know roughly how many events you need to try to achieve a certain number of final events, it would be useful if you cou…