-
Hi - I compiled a list of the changes we did after the feedback received. Please review it and add anything else missing. Thanks!
* Feedback from TA (Milestone 1)
- [x] missing a data direct…
-
@boguth @michaelkunc @pmacaluso3 @nsiefken :eyes:
hey y'all! Loving the work that I'm seeing in this repo. What I'd like to add to the mix is code review and sign off on one another's PRs before me…
-
## Funnel Entry Date
2023-01
## Idea Owner
@l00mi
## Idea Description
Inside the academic apparatus peer reviewed papers are valorised (with monetary and other resources). Include open sour…
l00mi updated
4 months ago
-
# Week of 02-27, Performance Task Scoring, peer reviews | APCSP
Student suggested work to prepare for College Board submit
[https://nighthawkcoders.github.io/APCSP/points/24](https://nighthawkcoders…
-
[orcid.org](orcid.org) already registers peer reviews online, and we could import such reviews. Itallows journals and other authorized actors such [Publons](publons.com) to write those reviews, so the…
-
Peer to peer code reviews:
-
## To-do list peer to peer code reviews
-
Enable options for equal weighting of peer and staff reviews (Campus WG)
-
List each member of your team including yourself.
For each member, including yourself, rate their overall effort on a scale of 1 to 10.
(1 being almost no effort at all and 10 going above and beyo…
-
### What went wrong, step-by-step?
1. Tried to deposit a Pub that is a rejoinder of several other pubs
2. It tried to deposit itself as a peer review, but Crossref rejected it because it didn't have…