-
### Expected behavior
When the script is executed, the SX operation should be applied to the qubit at index 1, as specified in the circuit definition. The QASM string generated from the circuit shoul…
-
### Expected behavior
Hi,
I have a simple example using "default.qubit" device and I would like to specify c_dtype to be {np.complex64, np.complex128}
### Actual behavior
I have 2 problems:
1.…
-
**Tentative agenda**
- News from the ecosystem
- Benchmarking Graphs.jl before attempting big changes (@filchristou ?)
- A new interface checker (@olegfafurin ?)
-
### Expected behavior
I want to call `qml.adjoint(qml.DepolarizingChannel)(0.1, wires=0)` with the `default.mixed` device. I expect the circuit to perform the adjoint of qml.DepolarizingChannel
### …
-
### Expected behavior
The following code
```
dev1 = qml.device("lightning.qubit", wires=1)
@qml.qnode(dev1)
def circuit2(phi1, phi2):
qml.RX(phi1, wires=0)
qml.RY(phi2, wires=0)
…
-
### Expected behavior
I would expect that if I do qml.compile() of a template and its adjoint template, the decompositions would be equivalent but adjoined. However the depth of the decomposition i…
-
### Repository commit
46379861257d43bb7140d261094bf17dc414950f
### Python version (python --version)
Python 3.11.3
### Dependencies version (pip freeze)
absl-py==1.4.0
astunparse==1.6.3
beautif…
-
### Expected behavior
This toy example should return [1,0]
```python
import pennylane as qml
dev = qml.device("default.qubit")
@qml.qnode(dev)
def circuit():
qml.measure(wires = "my wir…
-
#### Issue description
Trying to use `qml.qchem.molecular_hamiltonian` inside of a callback and it's not working.
* *Expected behavior:* I expect that generating a `Hamiltonian` in a callback sh…
-
### Information
- **rustworkx version**: 0.15.1
- **Python version**: 3.9, 3.11 and 3.10 (Colab)
- **Rust version**: None
- **Operating system**: Ubuntu 22.04 and Google Colab
### What is the…
drauh updated
2 months ago