-
Thanks for great work.
Shapes are now getting used extensively, as they make working with rdf types lot easier by giving predictable shapes to data, in otherwise open-world.
It would be great if…
-
It would be great if support for the [NodeContraintComponent](https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#NodeConstraintComponent)s were added to the [generate](https://shacl-play.sparna.fr/play/generate) functional…
jeswr updated
4 months ago
-
Hi,
I wanted to post an issue for a future release, but it seems there is a second github repo present. And this this repo there is no reference to the other.
- https://github.com/w3c/shacl
- h…
-
The following Shapes graph and Data graph exemplifies SHACL AND. It should work but, it does not.
Example Shapes Graph
```
ex:SuperShape
a sh:NodeShape ;
sh:property [
sh:path ex:property …
-
**Describe the bug**
When ingesting a shacl shape which is identified with a relative URI (instead of a blank node) then the shacl shape is identified in the LDES using a `file://` scheme.
**To Re…
-
Hi there
First of all: nice tool!
I have the following use case: I define SHACL Shapes to define a subset of schema.org types (classes) and properties (following https://datashapes.org/schema).
…
-
The Cookbook needs a section filled in on converting a DCTAP to SHACL.
-
- [x] #44
```
org.topbraid
shacl
```
- [ ] support for usage of shacl shapes as integrity constrains, e.g.
`?s kbss:has-input-graph-shape :PersonNode`
-
**To reproduce**
SHACL Shapes -> Create Shape, write/paste in definition, hit "Create Shape"
**Expected behavior**
In case "Unable to read SHACL definition", a reason should be displayed.
**Co…
-
SHACL is meant for validation. It has built-in information that would allow validating graph data. Normally, in the world of linked data / RDF, this would happen via some tool that supports shacl-vali…