-
```
According to the final draft
of 15444-1, section F.2 (normative), the inverse wavelet transform must
use periodic symmetric extension at boundaries.
I assume that this is also required for the f…
-
```
According to the final draft
of 15444-1, section F.2 (normative), the inverse wavelet transform must
use periodic symmetric extension at boundaries.
I assume that this is also required for the f…
-
```
According to the final draft
of 15444-1, section F.2 (normative), the inverse wavelet transform must
use periodic symmetric extension at boundaries.
I assume that this is also required for the f…
-
By adding this test:
```python
def test_wavelet_adjoint(wave_impl, shape_setup, floating_dtype):
"""Verify that the adjoint of the wavelet operator is correct.
This is done by checki…
-
```
According to the final draft
of 15444-1, section F.2 (normative), the inverse wavelet transform must
use periodic symmetric extension at boundaries.
I assume that this is also required for the f…
-
```
According to the final draft
of 15444-1, section F.2 (normative), the inverse wavelet transform must
use periodic symmetric extension at boundaries.
I assume that this is also required for the f…
-
```
According to the final draft
of 15444-1, section F.2 (normative), the inverse wavelet transform must
use periodic symmetric extension at boundaries.
I assume that this is also required for the f…
-
```
According to the final draft
of 15444-1, section F.2 (normative), the inverse wavelet transform must
use periodic symmetric extension at boundaries.
I assume that this is also required for the f…
-
I've been assuming the wavelet length is n_cycles/freq. it's not (https://mne.discourse.group/t/help-understanding-tfr-n-cycles/7257)
would be good to hard code this in somewhere so people know ho…
-
In the current state of the project, the exchange of the information between the model and the view is too clunky.
The view contains functionality dedicated to updating the visuals and gui stuff.
…