-
xfstests(btrfs/099) is broken with progs pre-release 5.15-rc1
It seems NOT a feature change, just a bug.
```
# /usr/sbin/btrfs qgroup limit 134217728 5 /mnt/scratch
ERROR: invalid qgroupid or …
-
The last missing piece for perfect NixOS integration is a NixOS module. This will allow awesome things like specifying
```nix
fileSystems."/mnt/apfs" = {
device = "/dev/disk/by-partlabel/apfs";
…
-
Scrub seems to have found an error in last night's snapshot:
```
zpool status -v rpool
pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corrupti…
-
Chris Murphy reported a problem where `btrfs scrub status` reports "aborted" once the scrub finishes successfully. He had a pastebin, but it's expired, but presumably should be straightforward to rep…
-
The fstest test btrfs/029 is failing on null_blk for me:
> btrfs/029 - output mismatch (see /home/johannes/src/xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/029.out.bad)
> --- tests/btrfs/029.out 2020…
-
I don't understand how to test my filesystem with this test suite.
I started playing and extracted a version of loopbackfs that is simply mounted using
```
ploufs
```
The test suite is not exactl…
-
The test was a git random checkout, on 2 devices (2G), with compression zstd:15 (with the recent compression patches applied, no problems), then followed by scrub, remount with compress=no, some subvo…
kdave updated
3 years ago
-
> rapido1:/home/johannes/src/xfstests-dev# cat results/btrfs/209.full
> btrfs-progs v5.12.1
> See http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for more information. …
-
**What would you like to be added**:
Run integrity test using xfstests
**Why is this needed**:
We'd like to know more on the compatibility
-
David reported:
> there are tons of errors in syslog
> blk_update_request: I/O error, dev nullb1, sector 1281112 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x0 phys_seg 2 prio class 0
> BTRFS error (device nullb0): bd…