-
```
What version of the product are you using?
3.1.2
Please provide any additional information below.
nate@haswell:~/git/cuckoo$ likwid -m -C2 -g
PAGE_WALKER_LOADS_DTLB_L2:PMC0,PAGE_WALKER_LOADS_D…
-
```
The performance groups in perfCtr are not validated.
This is especially true for Intel Nehalem.
Solution:
Validate the existing groups with the implemented events.
Think about new metrics for pe…
-
```
The current output filter concept uses the standard table output for parsing.
This is tedious. Add a better standard intermediate format which used by all
scripts. The standard text output is th…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Set install path with a slash at the end
2. make && make install
3. likwid-pin will result in an error
What is the expected output? What do you see inste…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create a cgroup cpuset with a limited number of cores (1 for example). In my
case, a cpuset created by PBS.
2. Try to use likwid-pin
What is the expecte…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. hack your Makefile to build likwid-accessD with ICC for Phi
2. run likwid-accessD on the coprocessor
What is the expected output? What do you see instead…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. run the command "sudo likwid-perfctr -g FLOPS_DP -c 0 ./a.out"
2. a.out a serial program, moreover replacing a.out with simple command like ls
also has t…
-
```
For threaded applications it is tedious to specify the core list
two times. A better solution is to integrate the pinning functionality in
likwid-perfctr.
```
Original issue reported on code.goog…
-
```
Determine and print also NUMA information in likwid-topology
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `jan.trei...@gmail.com` on 26 Mar 2010 at 2:08
-
```
The performance groups in perfCtr are not validated.
This is especially true for Intel Nehalem.
Solution:
Validate the existing groups with the implemented events.
Think about new metrics for pe…