-
```
A useful option that would be welcome in OHM.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `furex.fu...@gmail.com` on 24 Feb 2010 at 7:17
-
```
A useful option that would be welcome in OHM.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `furex.fu...@gmail.com` on 24 Feb 2010 at 7:17
-
```
A useful option that would be welcome in OHM.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `furex.fu...@gmail.com` on 24 Feb 2010 at 7:17
-
```
A useful option that would be welcome in OHM.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `furex.fu...@gmail.com` on 24 Feb 2010 at 7:17
-
```
A useful option that would be welcome in OHM.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `furex.fu...@gmail.com` on 24 Feb 2010 at 7:17
-
```
A useful option that would be welcome in OHM.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `furex.fu...@gmail.com` on 24 Feb 2010 at 7:17
-
> An issues related to the [draft conceptual model](https://github.com/openownership/data-standard/issues/7)
Each statement published by an organisation MUST have a unique statement identifier.
…
-
## May 2019 Ballot Comment: Include web sockets proposal
Submitted by @MichaelTClifton on behalf of @isaacvetter (isaac@epic.com )
**Chapter/section:** Overall
**Url:**
**Type:** NEG :exclamation: …
-
```
A useful option that would be welcome in OHM.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `furex.fu...@gmail.com` on 24 Feb 2010 at 7:17
-
```
A useful option that would be welcome in OHM.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `furex.fu...@gmail.com` on 24 Feb 2010 at 7:17