-
```
As the summary says. We don't need to complicate gtest with Pimpl here.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `w...@google.com` on 28 Jul 2010 at 6:52
-
```
As the summary says. We don't need to complicate gtest with Pimpl here.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `w...@google.com` on 28 Jul 2010 at 6:52
-
```
As the summary says. We don't need to complicate gtest with Pimpl here.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `w...@google.com` on 28 Jul 2010 at 6:52
-
```
As the summary says. We don't need to complicate gtest with Pimpl here.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `w...@google.com` on 28 Jul 2010 at 6:52
-
```
As the summary says. We don't need to complicate gtest with Pimpl here.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `w...@google.com` on 28 Jul 2010 at 6:52
-
```
As the summary says. We don't need to complicate gtest with Pimpl here.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `w...@google.com` on 28 Jul 2010 at 6:52
-
```
As the summary says. We don't need to complicate gtest with Pimpl here.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `w...@google.com` on 28 Jul 2010 at 6:52
-
```
As the summary says. We don't need to complicate gtest with Pimpl here.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `w...@google.com` on 28 Jul 2010 at 6:52
-
```
As the summary says. We don't need to complicate gtest with Pimpl here.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `w...@google.com` on 28 Jul 2010 at 6:52
-
```
As the summary says. We don't need to complicate gtest with Pimpl here.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `w...@google.com` on 28 Jul 2010 at 6:52