-
## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
With one significant exception, `--fix-layout` behaves the way we might expect a code formatter to behave: "Layout cops inspect you…
-
```
Calling Exp.New(value type) causes the exception "Cannot find constructor"
because Type.GetConstructors doesn't return the default constructor of value
types. I gather that the constructor does …
-
I want to propose a new syntax for optional accessing:
```jl
FooStruct?.bar
FooArray?[10]
FooDict?["bar"]
```
- `FooStruct?.bar` for optional accessing of `struct` fields.
If the field is …
-
```
Calling Exp.New(value type) causes the exception "Cannot find constructor"
because Type.GetConstructors doesn't return the default constructor of value
types. I gather that the constructor does …
-
```
What would be really, really nice, would be if I could add an instance of
javax.swing.Action to a SourceListItem. Or something similar.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `steve.mc…
-
```
What would be really, really nice, would be if I could add an instance of
javax.swing.Action to a SourceListItem. Or something similar.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `steve.mc…
-
```
What would be really, really nice, would be if I could add an instance of
javax.swing.Action to a SourceListItem. Or something similar.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `steve.mc…
-
```
What would be really, really nice, would be if I could add an instance of
javax.swing.Action to a SourceListItem. Or something similar.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `steve.mc…
-
```
What would be really, really nice, would be if I could add an instance of
javax.swing.Action to a SourceListItem. Or something similar.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `steve.mc…
-
```
What would be really, really nice, would be if I could add an instance of
javax.swing.Action to a SourceListItem. Or something similar.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `steve.mc…