-
# Progress Tracker
## DSA
- [x] Complete Git & GitHub Course
- [ ] Introduction to Programming
- - [ ] Types of languages
- - [ ] Memory management
- [ ] Flow of the program
- - [ ] Flo…
-
There has been a request to add named accessor methods in addition to `operator[]` and `operator()`.
See Twitter thread by @azadkuh [here](https://twitter.com/azadkuh/status/906587549300387847).
Tho…
-
... instead of converting to markdown.
(in the README)
-
## Search Terms
recursive, flow, pipe, chain
## Suggestion
I do not have a specific implementation in mind to support this. There is a decent existing solution [by a stackoverflow user](htt…
-
```
Implement SingleOrNew as per
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/561762/what-about-a-singleornew-method-
instead-of-singleordefault-in-linq/561787#561787
```
Original issue reported on code.goo…
-
```
Implement SingleOrNew as per
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/561762/what-about-a-singleornew-method-
instead-of-singleordefault-in-linq/561787#561787
```
Original issue reported on code.goo…
-
Add a feature that allows public reading of classmembers but only protected/private write access to avoid excessive use of gettermethods which blow up the code.
Solution 1: introduce a new keyword fo…
-
```
Implement SingleOrNew as per
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/561762/what-about-a-singleornew-method-
instead-of-singleordefault-in-linq/561787#561787
```
Original issue reported on code.goo…
-
In a larger app where we have lots of reducers and dispatched actions, does it make sense to try and avoid type checking within each reducer?
For example, the following is 1 reducer in the TodoMvc ex…
dinoc updated
6 years ago
-
As in issue #8 sugestet, it may be nice if parameter and other Types could be replaced with different types.
From original issue
```c#
[Mixin(typeof(Shared), nameof(Test), nameof(Test) )] // `cl…