-
Couldn't find an issue directly addressing this, but it would be pretty nice, if not essential, that there's a good testing framework for making sure that changes do not regress the code. I understand…
ghost updated
6 years ago
-
### Is there an existing issue for this?
- [X] I have searched the existing issues
### Forums discussion
https://forum.freecad.org/viewtopic.php?t=76133
### Version
0.21 (Development)
### Full v…
-
```
The new C++11 standard allows for rvalue references in method parameters. Using
those for move semantics is very useful. We need to suppor them, e.g.:
MOCK_METHOD1(mock, foo(int&& i));
```
Orig…
-
```
The new C++11 standard allows for rvalue references in method parameters. Using
those for move semantics is very useful. We need to suppor them, e.g.:
MOCK_METHOD1(mock, foo(int&& i));
```
Orig…
-
```
The new C++11 standard allows for rvalue references in method parameters. Using
those for move semantics is very useful. We need to suppor them, e.g.:
MOCK_METHOD1(mock, foo(int&& i));
```
Orig…
-
```
The new C++11 standard allows for rvalue references in method parameters. Using
those for move semantics is very useful. We need to suppor them, e.g.:
MOCK_METHOD1(mock, foo(int&& i));
```
Orig…
-
```
The new C++11 standard allows for rvalue references in method parameters. Using
those for move semantics is very useful. We need to suppor them, e.g.:
MOCK_METHOD1(mock, foo(int&& i));
```
Orig…
-
```
The new C++11 standard allows for rvalue references in method parameters. Using
those for move semantics is very useful. We need to suppor them, e.g.:
MOCK_METHOD1(mock, foo(int&& i));
```
Orig…
-
```
The new C++11 standard allows for rvalue references in method parameters. Using
those for move semantics is very useful. We need to suppor them, e.g.:
MOCK_METHOD1(mock, foo(int&& i));
```
Orig…
-
```
The new C++11 standard allows for rvalue references in method parameters. Using
those for move semantics is very useful. We need to suppor them, e.g.:
MOCK_METHOD1(mock, foo(int&& i));
```
Orig…