-
```
=== What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Please, run the following testcase. I've used AForge 2.0.0.0
public class AForgeFFTTestCase : ITestCase
{
public void Run()
{
…
-
```
=== What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Please, run the following testcase. I've used AForge 2.0.0.0
public class AForgeFFTTestCase : ITestCase
{
public void Run()
{
…
-
```
=== What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Please, run the following testcase. I've used AForge 2.0.0.0
public class AForgeFFTTestCase : ITestCase
{
public void Run()
{
…
-
```
=== What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Please, run the following testcase. I've used AForge 2.0.0.0
public class AForgeFFTTestCase : ITestCase
{
public void Run()
{
…
-
## User Story - Business Need
We'd like to add new fields to assign a sender to the applicable provider and a description field so we know what use case the sender is used for.
- [ ] Ticket is…
-
### What's missing?
but this time actually implement it, don't add any TODO comments. just write the whole thing in one PR
### Ideal Solution
_No response_
### Why can't this be implemented outside of…
-
```
=== What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Please, run the following testcase. I've used AForge 2.0.0.0
public class AForgeFFTTestCase : ITestCase
{
public void Run()
{
…
-
```
=== What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Please, run the following testcase. I've used AForge 2.0.0.0
public class AForgeFFTTestCase : ITestCase
{
public void Run()
{
…
-
```
=== What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Please, run the following testcase. I've used AForge 2.0.0.0
public class AForgeFFTTestCase : ITestCase
{
public void Run()
{
…
-
```
=== What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Please, run the following testcase. I've used AForge 2.0.0.0
public class AForgeFFTTestCase : ITestCase
{
public void Run()
{
…