-
```
While the number count is useful, the current implementation is too confusing.
Instead of putting the count in parentheses next to the number, like this:
5(6)
how about putting it in the low…
-
```
While the number count is useful, the current implementation is too confusing.
Instead of putting the count in parentheses next to the number, like this:
5(6)
how about putting it in the low…
-
```
While the number count is useful, the current implementation is too confusing.
Instead of putting the count in parentheses next to the number, like this:
5(6)
how about putting it in the low…
-
```
While the number count is useful, the current implementation is too confusing.
Instead of putting the count in parentheses next to the number, like this:
5(6)
how about putting it in the low…
-
```
While the number count is useful, the current implementation is too confusing.
Instead of putting the count in parentheses next to the number, like this:
5(6)
how about putting it in the low…
-
```
While the number count is useful, the current implementation is too confusing.
Instead of putting the count in parentheses next to the number, like this:
5(6)
how about putting it in the low…
-
```
While the number count is useful, the current implementation is too confusing.
Instead of putting the count in parentheses next to the number, like this:
5(6)
how about putting it in the low…
-
```
While the number count is useful, the current implementation is too confusing.
Instead of putting the count in parentheses next to the number, like this:
5(6)
how about putting it in the low…
-
```
While the number count is useful, the current implementation is too confusing.
Instead of putting the count in parentheses next to the number, like this:
5(6)
how about putting it in the low…
-
```
While the number count is useful, the current implementation is too confusing.
Instead of putting the count in parentheses next to the number, like this:
5(6)
how about putting it in the low…