-
Two kinds of errors on "ingress-per-unit-relation-broken" in the latest revision of traefik (123) still persist after #151 :
## 1
https://github.com/canonical/traefik-k8s-operator/blob/34a0aa5ca57…
-
```
dylan@protostar:~$ jhack jenv
╭─────────────────────────────── Traceback (most recent call last) ────────────────────────────────╮
│ /home/dylan/repos/jhack/venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/jh…
-
### Bug Description
The new version of cos-agent lib switched to a new schema + pydantic validation.
As a result, charm code raises and the unit is in error state.
Instead, it should probably block…
-
## Steps to reproduce
1. `juju deploy mysql-k8s --channel 8.0/edge --trust --series jammy`
2. `juju deploy mysql-router-k8s --channel 8.0/edge --series jammy`
3. `juju relate mysql-k8s mysql-ro…
-
A test relation is initialized using `harness.add_relation_unit` and `harness.update_relation_data`. A side effect of this needing two calls is the relation-joined handlers get called between the two …
-
I can `juju deploy foo --channel bar --revision 42`, but `juju.Model.deploy` does not seem to have a way to control `revision`.
Can we add this feature?
Some more context:
I heard a rumor that …
-
# Use Case
The operator framework and Juju provide a useful set of application lifecycle events that charms use in managing their application states. These pre-defined events satisfy most of the use…
-
Failed to reach active/idle:
training-operator blocked: K8S resources creation failed
[Jira](https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/KF-1105)
Merge into:
- [x] `track/1.6` (release KF v1.7)
-…
-
## Steps to reproduce
1. `juju deploy mysql-k8s --channel 8.0/edge --trust`
2. `juju deploy mysql-router-k8s --channel 8.0/edge`
3. `juju relate mysql-k8s mysql-router-k8s`
4. Wait for active/…
-
The page states `order in which charms are upgraded does not matter`. Slurm docs all mention upgrading the Slurmdbd first. Does `juju` take this into account?
Additionally, does Juju take into acco…