-
```
From mailgroup discussion:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-collections-users/browse_thread/thread/8ec
f2ef59a11870e
The release notes for RC1 say
AbstractMapEntry. Most usages of this can …
-
```
From mailgroup discussion:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-collections-users/browse_thread/thread/8ec
f2ef59a11870e
The release notes for RC1 say
AbstractMapEntry. Most usages of this can …
-
```
mark.kharitonov@gmail.com
==============
Discussed here -
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6063273/is-it-possible-to-deserialize-a-priva
te-property-using-protobuf-net-in-silverli
```
Origina…
-
```
mark.kharitonov@gmail.com
==============
Discussed here -
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6063273/is-it-possible-to-deserialize-a-priva
te-property-using-protobuf-net-in-silverli
```
Origina…
-
```
The CacheBuilder Javadoc should specify the default values for all properties.
It's not clear what the expected behavior is for the following cache:
CacheBuilder.newBuilder().build();
```
Origi…
-
```
From mailgroup discussion:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-collections-users/browse_thread/thread/8ec
f2ef59a11870e
The release notes for RC1 say
AbstractMapEntry. Most usages of this can …
-
```
mark.kharitonov@gmail.com
==============
Discussed here -
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6063273/is-it-possible-to-deserialize-a-priva
te-property-using-protobuf-net-in-silverli
```
Origina…
-
Documentation for properties is painfully verbose
As Dart already allows fields and properties to be used interchangeably in interfaces and classes, we should always represent properties as fields whe…
-
```
The CacheBuilder Javadoc should specify the default values for all properties.
It's not clear what the expected behavior is for the following cache:
CacheBuilder.newBuilder().build();
```
Origi…
-
```
From mailgroup discussion:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-collections-users/browse_thread/thread/8ec
f2ef59a11870e
The release notes for RC1 say
AbstractMapEntry. Most usages of this can …