-
```
After Namebench did initial health check on 411 servers, it just started from
#1 again.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `reakt...@gmail.com` on 31 Jul 2011 at 10:53
-
```
After Namebench did initial health check on 411 servers, it just started from
#1 again.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `reakt...@gmail.com` on 31 Jul 2011 at 10:53
-
```
After Namebench did initial health check on 411 servers, it just started from
#1 again.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `reakt...@gmail.com` on 31 Jul 2011 at 10:53
-
```
After Namebench did initial health check on 411 servers, it just started from
#1 again.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `reakt...@gmail.com` on 31 Jul 2011 at 10:53
-
```
After Namebench did initial health check on 411 servers, it just started from
#1 again.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `reakt...@gmail.com` on 31 Jul 2011 at 10:53
-
```
After Namebench did initial health check on 411 servers, it just started from
#1 again.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `reakt...@gmail.com` on 31 Jul 2011 at 10:53
-
```
After Namebench did initial health check on 411 servers, it just started from
#1 again.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `reakt...@gmail.com` on 31 Jul 2011 at 10:53
-
```
After Namebench did initial health check on 411 servers, it just started from
#1 again.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `reakt...@gmail.com` on 31 Jul 2011 at 10:53
-
```
After Namebench did initial health check on 411 servers, it just started from
#1 again.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `reakt...@gmail.com` on 31 Jul 2011 at 10:53
-
```
After Namebench did initial health check on 411 servers, it just started from
#1 again.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `reakt...@gmail.com` on 31 Jul 2011 at 10:53