-
```
I'm seeing some kerning issues with mactype. I was previously using gdipp and
it rendered fonts with better kerning (minor issues, but overall better). I've
tried different settings to get close…
-
```
I'm seeing some kerning issues with mactype. I was previously using gdipp and
it rendered fonts with better kerning (minor issues, but overall better). I've
tried different settings to get close…
-
```
Diffs in Rietveld emails are mostly useless for Python code, because they have
badly formatted indentation. I wonder what it takes to force diffs in these
email be in proportional font?
```
Or…
-
``` rst
The rst markup was only partly implemented for IDLdoc 3.0. Missing markup that should be implemented:
* lists (numbered, bulleted, and definition)
* *emphasis* and **bold**
* inline ``c…
-
```
I'm seeing some kerning issues with mactype. I was previously using gdipp and
it rendered fonts with better kerning (minor issues, but overall better). I've
tried different settings to get close…
-
```
I'm seeing some kerning issues with mactype. I was previously using gdipp and
it rendered fonts with better kerning (minor issues, but overall better). I've
tried different settings to get close…
-
```
I'm seeing some kerning issues with mactype. I was previously using gdipp and
it rendered fonts with better kerning (minor issues, but overall better). I've
tried different settings to get close…
-
```
I'm seeing some kerning issues with mactype. I was previously using gdipp and
it rendered fonts with better kerning (minor issues, but overall better). I've
tried different settings to get close…
-
```
I'm seeing some kerning issues with mactype. I was previously using gdipp and
it rendered fonts with better kerning (minor issues, but overall better). I've
tried different settings to get close…
-
```
I'm seeing some kerning issues with mactype. I was previously using gdipp and
it rendered fonts with better kerning (minor issues, but overall better). I've
tried different settings to get close…