-
The spec provides no [ABNF](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5234) for the [additional headers](https://wicg.github.io/private-network-access/#headers). This is in contrast with the Fetch stan…
-
This document defines new app strings but defines no syntax for those app-strings.
If the single-layer ABNF approach is defined in draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals as proposed in [EDN literals PR#49](h…
-
### Describe the issue
When I paste the ABNF into the form and hit the "Parse ABNF" button, it just spins and spins.
### Code of Conduct
- [X] I agree to follow the [IETF's Code of Conduct](https:/…
-
Now in draft -12
"As an alternative illustration of the SD-JWT format, for those who celebrate, ABNF [[RFC5234](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt-11.html#RFC52…
-
In Sec. [The WIT HTTP Header](https://www.sheffer.org/wimse-s2s/draft-sheffer-wimse-s2s-protocol.html#name-the-wit-http-header), we define the ABNF even though we say the WIT is a JWT and this complet…
-
The ABNF in this document has three instances that define the `sexp` node (for "basic", "canonical", and "advanced" forms).
These re-definitions each repeat some sub-nodes (e.g. `raw` and `decimal`…
-
As mentioned in:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5663
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/uR-LCpD1BLA_9cXPZJrqX3IoPOc
The current table in RFC7950, Section 7.20.3.2 lists all permit…
-
On Graph Explorer, we use [these construction rules](https://github.com/oasis-tcs/odata-abnf/blob/main/abnf/odata-abnf-construction-rules.txt) together with an ABNF parser to validate URLs entered by …
-
The ABNF states only `CRLF` are allowed in the PGP parts of security.txt.
So only the cleartext or unsigned can use `LF` or `CRLF`.
_See update: I missed the errata, only the 'extra newlines' (singl…
-
https://github.com/dhall-lang/dhall-lang/blob/60629b9d198af49984e9f9da337036942147af8b/standard/dhall.abnf
This is the ABNF file for the dhall language, it might not be a fully spec-compliant abnf …