-
Are the re any plans to add Behavior-driven testing style as an alternative?
### Expected Behavior
```
given / coGiven
// action (when)
then / coThen
```
### Current Behavior
```
…
-
**Describe the bug**
Firstly, I'm not sure if this is a Pactum or Vitest issue but I *think* it's probably more here.
When writing Pactum tests in the Builder style, if you're using Vitest as the …
-
They are not on the roadmap, but they are important. https://github.com/doctest/doctest/blob/master/doc/markdown/testcases.md#bdd-style-test-cases
The tests written in BDD are a lot more readable. ht…
-
Hi ..
I am using serenity runner with Jbehave BDD . when i try to integrate report portal serenity ,I am getting the below error.Please help me .
-
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Testing UI integration does not show tests defined written in BDD style (https://deno.land/std@0.136.0/testing/bdd.ts).
**Descr…
-
**Description**
`DYNAMIC_SECTION` makes it easy to generate portions of test cases. However, when used inside a BDD scenario, it results in unsightly output when a test fails:
```
Scenario: move_…
-
**Describe the bug**
Nested tests are not detected.
**To Reproduce**
1. Write a test file, and use the BDD style — make sure you nest your tests!
2. Note the lack of green test running arrow…
-
A simple define is simply missing to achieve just that and be compatible:
`#define SCENARIO_METHOD(x, name) DOCTEST_TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(x, " Scenario: " name)`
-
True RSpec test output on the console is colourized, and more importantly, grouped according to the context in which each test runs, as shown below:
![vim-lg3](http://drasticcode.com/images/user/vim-…
-
## Acceptance Criteria
- [x] Update the `EVSS::DisabilityCompensationForm::Form0781` job to use the shared endpoint functionality that was implemented in https://github.com/department-of-veterans-aff…