-
Given the nature of the project we should change the license to `MPL-2.0`.
@Grufoony @NotLudovico can you comment with "yes" to confirm that you agree (IANAL but this is needed because `GPL` is copyl…
-
This repository contains several files called `js/main.js` across a few branches, and across several different directories per branch.
I am the original author of `js/main.js`, although due to that fi…
ghost updated
10 years ago
-
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
To quote from the website:
> You are free to:
>
> Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
> Adapt — remix, transform, a…
-
`LICENSE` and `LICENSE.md` disagree, with GPL3 and CC BY-NC 4.0 respectively. Which is it, or has it changed in the 8 years since?
-
### Description
Hello, I'm running into a core dump when writing TPU kernels. I was testing with interpret on, and the kernel was working. Without it, I get a core dump. Any temporary fix is apprecia…
-
-
https://openregulatory.com/template-license/ says CC-BY-NC-SA, here it says CC BY. Which is right? My understanding from reading the license is that using the templates internally in a company would c…
-
Version 2.5 India licenses have "a" through "j" in Definitions section, but they seem to have skipped term/condition 1c (i.e. "c" in Definitions section), though this has been long since 2007/2008
* …
gho87 updated
10 hours ago
-
### Description
This code snippet:
~~~
/*
* Simple square root algorithm. This is from:
* http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1623375/writing-your-own-square-root-function
* Written by…
-
This is needed to support a lot of imagery that is compatible with OSM.
Specifically DG or Planet, they are both cc-by-nc+osm
Someone said this was coded but not merged.