-
Given the nature of the project we should change the license to `MPL-2.0`.
@Grufoony @NotLudovico can you comment with "yes" to confirm that you agree (IANAL but this is needed because `GPL` is copyl…
-
Non-commercial (NC) clauses are non-free as they are not free software according to the [FSF](https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html#selling), open source according to the [OSI](https://opensourc…
-
### 你当前使用的halo版本
2.0.0
### 你当前使用的主题版本
2.0.5
### 你的建议是否涉及到一些现有的问题?
版权声明: 本站所有文章除特别声明外,均采用 [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 许可协议。
上面这种
像这种可以改成转载的或者自定义的吗
### …
-
PR #756 changed the license for wg-easy from a short hand-rolled license to CC BY-NC-SA-4.0.
The previous license explicitly stated that users may 'use this software for a company' but that they m…
-
# LICENSE: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 | Emily Riederer
My posts are released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
[https://emilyriederer.netlify.app/license/]…
-
Currently the default license is empty. Our terms of use say that unless otherwise specified the license is CC BY-NC-SA-4.0, it would probably be better to set this explicitly by default.
-
Add the CC license we use to a LICENSE.md file to make it more official.
-
Hello, you set license of this project to GPL which allows commercial use but original license is non-commercial see https://github.com/yisol/IDM-VTON/issues/13
so both are not compatible in my opini…
-
# Option 2 – the list of licenses
When selecting _Copyright_ ↦ _Option 2_, a list of licenses is presented, which seems to be slightly arbitrary.
As _Option 1_ provides the intersection of licen…
-
@robjhyndman thoughts on licensing? -- maybe https://chooser-beta.creativecommons.org