-
**Tasks:**
* [x] Replace drf-yasg custom inspectors with drf-yasg extensions
* [x] Keep the support of all existing schema customization, including error responses, separate content type for error r…
-
Along with DRF's schema generators, it would be handy to have an adapter for `def-spectacular`, as it's becoming de-facto standard tool for OpenAPI schema generation in DRF.
-
### Describe the problem
Right now `redoc` is bundled via [drf-spectacular-sidecar](https://pypi.org/project/drf-spectacular-sidecar/). That way, we don't directly control `redoc` version, it is mi…
nijel updated
4 weeks ago
-
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Currently the API is browsable with included DRF API browser. It just works but it is not useful as something else like Swagger or R…
-
I just read through thread #866 and I’m relatively new to this codebase.
**My Issue**
When I call the `drf_spectacular.views.SpectacularAPIView` view, the error and warning messages are logged i…
-
**Describe the bug**
For code reuse, it's often useful to expose endpoints for the same data at different layers within the overall tree of data. If a `DataclassSerializer` is used for both a paren…
-
### Rationale / Begründung
`django-rest-swagger` is deprecated since 2019. Should rdmo switch to an alternative openapi library? `drf-spectacular` looks promising.
### Affected
Software grou…
-
I do not see any reason why `readOnly` fields should be part of schemas that are exclusively used for requests, like `PatchedX`:
For example: https://github.com/tfranzel/drf-spectacular/blob/master…
-
I'm using DRF and drf-spectacular, and it uses runtime type introspection for some cases (like `serializers.SerializerMethodField()`. And i have no way to tell `ruff` to not move those types into TYPE…
-
I am currently working on a Django project and have configured the SPECTACULAR_SETTINGS as shown:
```python
SPECTACULAR_SETTINGS = {
"POSTPROCESSING_HOOKS": [
"drf_spectacular.hooks.po…