-
### Enhancement summary
TOI strongly recommends enabling the control-word for EVPN VPWS services:
https://www.arista.com/en/support/toi/eos-4-24-0f/14484-evpn-mpls-virtual-private-wire-service-vpw…
-
### Description
I'm attempting to use FRR as a route reflector for our EVPN/MPLS/ISIS-SR network.
It seems to be losing the label for type 1 circuits and sending 1048575 instead (binary 1111111111…
-
### Enhancement summary
Just looking to support the following command:
```
address-family vpn-ipv4
neighbor default encapsulation mpls next-hop-self received-vpnv4-routes
````
(command als…
-
---------------
[x] Did you check if this is a duplicate issue?
[x] Did you test it on the latest FRRouting/frr master branch?
**Describe the bug**
Hello, not sure if it's a bug or simply someth…
-
### Enhancement summary
Add Molecule scenario for evpn-mpls, isis-sr & evpn-ipvpn-gateway
Use A/A & MLAG if supported.
A few services and endpoints.
### Which component of AVD is impacted
other…
-
-
According to RFC 7432, EVPN Type 2 message allows to carry two MPLS Labels, and every label is allocating with 3 octets (24 bits). This works perfectly fine when Type 2 is for VxLAN (bgp.TUNNEL_TYPE_V…
-
Hi,
So far every implementation of EVPN on FRR platform is centric at VXLAN / VNI interfaces. EVPN does not necessarily have to be implemented along with VXLAN all the time.
Are there any future…
-
### Describe the bug
Netlab does not accept a topology with STP module declared in a group
### Expected behavior
Should be possible
### Lab topology
```
---
defaults.provider: clab
…
-
Hi vapor-ware team,
Great plugin. This is something I've been looking for in netbox for sometime.
In an MPLS environment we generally pop the tags and create virtual circuits between interfaces / …