-
Would be nice to have some basic inputs validation for our forms.
I had a nice experience using `Yup` library with Formik we currently use.
One of such helpful validations would be running
```ethe…
-
Almost all our consumers seem to be using formik so better to have some tests for our form elements that integrate with formik to minimize the chances to breakages.
-
## Purpose
We need to demonstrate how to use Cunningham inputs with popular React form libraries (React Hook Form & Formik).
## Proposal
Add within a documentation a dedicated part to explain…
-
## Bug report
### Current Behavior
Formik do not update properly values property when browser autofills user/password fields.
As you can see on this gif the input has visible values, but not …
-
### Description
The current login and signup forms lack comprehensive validation, both on the client and server sides. This gap may lead to a subpar user experience and potential errors during form s…
-
As we discussed earlier today, our current form implementation is the very definition of "over-engineered". I would like to rip it all out and start over.
- Study up on [Formik](https://formik.org/…
-
Look for simple implementation for form components using Formik and Yup to validate inputs throughout app
-
## 🐛 Bug report
I've created a FieldWrapper that looks somewhat like this:
```jsx
const MyField ({name, as: Component}) => (
{({field: {onChange, onBlur, ...rest}, form}) => (
…
-
## Bug report
### Current Behavior
When using Formik and `useField()` hook with [Typeahead](https://github.com/ericgio/react-bootstrap-typeahead), `meta.error` is typed as `undefined | string`, …
-
## Feature request
### Current Behavior
Currently there is no clean way to check if an input has been modified from it's initial value. Touched does not accomplish this, however touched is spe…