-
I have the feeling the dependabot is the only one contributing to this repository recently, so I would suggest we should archive it, unless there is more active development planned for this repository…
-
At our workflow hackathons at the ADIS meeting, we had some interesting discussions including a wish list from the user perspective. I am also thinking a lot about features that we need in the pyiron_…
JNmpi updated
2 months ago
-
@liamhuber, I really like the latest changes and developments in the look and feel of ironflow. It is fun working with it. Also, the possibility to start my binder sessions also for subbranches is sup…
JNmpi updated
2 years ago
-
**Summary**
The functionality of @liamhuber workflow class in pyiron_contrib could be a good starting point for interesting extensions and merging pyiron_base and ironflow.
@liamhuber, I had on…
-
In other repos where the CI is already migrated (e.g. [ironflow](https://github.com/pyiron/ironflow/tree/main/.github/workflows), [pyiron_module_template](https://github.com/pyiron/pyiron_module_templ…
-
Analogous to how [pyiron/ironflow](https://github.com/pyiron/ironflow) now leans on reusable workflows from [pyiron/actions](https://github.com/pyiron/actions), although here (a) we have some workflow…
-
I super nice feature would be to convert the graphical workflow into python/pyiron code and vice versa. This topic came also up a couple of times in our discussions. While I definititely support this …
JNmpi updated
2 years ago
-
**Summary**
**Detailed Description**
**Further Information, Files, and Links**
-
Thanks again @liamhuber for the pull functionality. I tested it for the list_potentials example in my lammps node. It works really well. In the present implementation, the list_potentials node is part…
-
From our conversation in #102
> > The following point is realted to pyiron, but required to get nice solutions for ironflow:
> > It would be good to have for some pyiron constructs an alternative…