-
Hello,
I have been revising the `UndulatorAtom` class and have noticed that there seems to be a couple of inconsistencies:
1. The general expression for the magnetic field seems to be wrong.
In t…
-
@tpurcell90 i skipped the `test_magnetic_orderings` you added in https://github.com/materialsproject/atomate2/pull/922 in this commit https://github.com/materialsproject/atomate2/pull/1056/commits/e7a…
-
I encountered a strange situation is that my system with DFT + U calculation of the atomic magnetic moment is 3.7uB, but with the TB2J calculation of the magnetic moment of the results of the file is …
-
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Hi, are there any plans to support for magnetic encoders over i2c like the AS500
**Describe the solution you'd like**
Ability to…
-
Summary of request: Add a new organization to ROR
Name of organization: IEEE Magnetics Society*en
Website: https://ieeemagnetics.org
Domains:ieeemagnetics.org
Link to publications:
Organization…
-
I calculated the energy of a 24-site honeycomb cluster for the pure Kitaev model, pure Gamma model, Kitaev + magnetic field, and Gamma model + magnetic field.
I get the correct results when I com…
-
### Issue with current documentation:
Some examples that make use of the magnetic simulations locate receivers on the same position as nodes in the mesh.
This is problematic since the B fields are…
-
## Versions
- **Silent Gear**: 4.0.2
- **Silent Lib**: 10.3.0
- **Forge**: NeoForge 21.1.65
- **Optifine Installed**: No
Apologies if this is already known (didn't see it listed on any of the r…
-
Hello,
Can we specify magnetic loss (imaginary part of mu) of the material? From a quick glance at the source code, I only see mat_muinv whereas for epsilon there is mat_epsilon, mat_epsilon_imag.
…
-
At least the code in the VTM does not respect headings true vs. magnetic - everything is displayed as heading true. In the M2000 display heading true/magnetic can be set and viewed in the VTB.