-
**TL;DR:** would a person from @coq/core volunteer to help me trigger docker-base or docker-coq rebuilds?
## Concretely, the problem:
* {docker-coq, docker-mathcomp} images aim to earn CI time b…
-
Salut @Zimmi48
FYI despite the line https://github.com/coq/bot/blob/master/src/actions.ml#L545
over the 49 jobs of docker-mathcomp https://gitlab.inria.fr/math-comp/docker-mathcomp/-/pipelines/83…
-
It was observed during the MathComp-Analysis dev meeting of 2023-12-21
that the existence of the `coq-mathcomp-classical` is not well-known @Tragicus
We should maybe improve the MathComp website
…
-
Hi @thery how about integrating your development to mathcomp?
-
After copying the disk image to my applications folder and trying to open it I get the message: “Coq-Platform~8.18~mc2 [or whatever version of the disk image I've downloaded] is damaged and can’t be o…
-
At the last math comp meeting we discussed about this code, and we believe it makes sense to merge it in mathcomp. Would you agree?
gares updated
4 years ago
-
Are there any plans for to support MathComp 2.0? It would be nice to port Disel to MathComp 2.0, but then I need both FCSL PCM and HTT to have releases compatible with [2.0.0](https://github.com/math-…
-
Hi,
Thanks for your work!
I am having a little issue, it seems coq-deriving is failing for Coq 8.18 and Ocaml 5.1.0:
```
[ERROR] The compilation of coq-deriving.dev failed at "make -j 11".
…
-
`doPtrEq` is [defined](https://github.com/GaloisInc/macaw/blob/645754178a034c22e97aac49a962c99b387aaa01/symbolic/src/Data/Macaw/Symbolic/MemOps.hs#L888) like so:
```haskell
doPtrEq :: PtrOp sym w (R…
-
TODO: revise the use of floor and ceil once ~~math-comp/math-comp#682 is merged into MathComp~~ requiring MC >= 2.1.0