-
Thanks for your releases. It seems that negative prompt is also concatenate with the positive prompt, isn't it? I have not found information about negative prompt in reference paper. How to deal with …
-
Is it normal that there is no neg. Prompt for SDXL with CFG 1 , im using a hyper/turbo model and it uses CFG1 but i cant set a neg. prompt.
-
Reference: https://www.github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/2135
- [ ] https://github.com/rendezqueue/rendezllama/issues/36 - Wait for sampling refactor.
- [ ] Implement.
-
The performance would be better if negative_prompt module be added,
I run fluxpipeline as below:
pipe = FluxPipeline.from_pretrained(model_path, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16)
image = pipe(
…
-
Is it possible to implement a negative prompt with this?
-
Do you plan to develop a comfyui plugin?
Or do you think using negative prompt is enough?
-
During inference, is it possible to specify a list of objects that we don't want to detect as part of some negative prompt?
-
The `###blurry, bad, text` bit was loaded into the normal text box by default when I opened Lucid creations for the first time ever, instead of the negative text box as the client expects it now.
vadi2 updated
3 months ago
-
### Feature Idea
On A1111-ism I preferred was the ability to build the output path using the shorthash of the prompt/negative prompt/model/etc. This provided a less messy output in some cases. Consid…
-
Do we only need to add added_prompt and negative_prompt during inference, not during training?