-
**Description**
---
We copy pasted the code of erc1155 of Openzeppelin and didn't import it. Two reasons for this:
First, the import wouldn't work with some Starknet foundry tests.
More importan…
-
**Github username:** --
**Twitter username:** --
**Submission hash (on-chain):** 0x87d7675b4f9018605f07ba10cce9ceb1703c550c275751bc5c7fa8a37853a51b
**Severity:** medium
**Description:**
**Descriptio…
-
Our pragmas are now "^0.8.24", while our current OpenZeppelin distribution has "^0.8.20". Not really a problem, but we should keep up with OZ, and ideally be on the same version (i.e., update our OZ v…
-
**Github username:** @krkbaa
**Twitter username:** 0xkrkba
**Submission hash (on-chain):** 0x85bb6985d2b4a173688a5f750c2b1a2377aa4f614a07ba47015bfe1704ef26a6
**Severity:** low
**Description:**
**Des…
-
> If I ignore the compile in slither-actions, it will successful. If not, it will occur error about openzeppelin-contracts in submodule.
The slither-actions worked successfully in few days ago, but…
-
I think connected to #53 - since then the core tries to call a function on the ProxyAdmin which doesn't exist in previous versions < 5 - so doing anything with LegacyUpgrades using OpenZeppelin contra…
-
packages/contracts use openzeppelin 's 5.0.0 , which does removes 777 , but account abstraction dependency uses 777 in their current latest version (0.6.0)
Hence forge build is throwing error
```
-…
-
### 🐛 Bug Report for hardaht-zksync plugins
#### 💥 Plugin name
@matterlabs/hardhat-zksync
#### 📝 Description
I'm trying to follow https://docs.zksync.io/build/tooling/hardhat/migrating-to-…
-
### templates
- [ ] Generic Runtime Template
- [X] Evm Template
### What happened?
Below is the recap of the audit findings and the related issues & PRs:
- [ ] 3.2.1 XCM delivery fees (n…
-
I try to deploy my contract using UUPS proxy (ERC1967). But when i run the script, foundry can't found the file.
Error message: "Details: `Fail - Unable to verify. Solidity Compilation Error: Sourc…