-
It would be nice to have a ppx extension which would provide a way to use literals. It is clumsy to write things like `Int32.of_string "0xffffffff"`
-
Since Campl4 is slowly become deprecated.
-
Duplicated from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71466896/incomplete-expression-in-ppx-extension
I want to try to write my own ppx to allow named arguments in formatting strings:
From `Format…
-
We recently tried to release a new version of `ppx_deriving` where the set of standard derivers it includes were ported to ppxlib's deriving API instead of the deprecated ppx_deriving one.
Doing so…
-
https://github.com/chetmurthy/pa_ppx/blob/master/README.md claims:
> the goal here is to show how easy it is to write PPX rewriters this way.
Can you show a detailed comparison that highlights …
MdeLv updated
4 years ago
-
It seems that `let%lwt () =` or `switch%lwt (...) {` break syntax highlighting and hover tooltips in ReasonML. Are ppx extension points supposed to work in ReasonML code?
-
```
Supporting a ppx frontend to the syntax extension ( see eg.
http://whitequark.org/blog/2014/04/16/a-guide-to-extension-points-in-ocaml/ for
a presentation of ppx ) would make it easier to work w…
-
We'd like to explore a way to be able to render a simple AST explorer on the playground interface. We may take some parts of what the ocaml-vscode extension uses (ppx_tools dumpast), adapt it to our n…
-
```
Supporting a ppx frontend to the syntax extension ( see eg.
http://whitequark.org/blog/2014/04/16/a-guide-to-extension-points-in-ocaml/ for
a presentation of ppx ) would make it easier to work w…
-
## Expected Behavior
I define a ppx which is expected to compile _only_ as a bytecode library:
```
(library
(name my_ppx)
...
(kind ppx_rewriter)
(modes byte))
```
I expect this t…