-
#### Describe the bug
An undocumented consequence of PR #3414 is that users are not allowed to use a bucket name that matches the first subdomain on an s3 endpoint.
#### To Reproduce
I am using Ceph …
-
Removing a microceph unit does not remove the node from microceph cluster.
Deployed sunbeam 2 node with all roles.
Removed the non-primary node using [1]
However `microceph status` on primary nod…
-
microceph-charm in handling one of the event took 10 minutes to complete the bootstrapping process.
Here are the relevant logs:
```
unit-microceph-0: 07:07:56 INFO unit.microceph/0.juju-log ident…
-
The consequence of this behavior is that the deployment needs manual help to complete in the form of manually issuing:
```
sudo systemctl stop snap.microceph.rgw.service
sudo systemctl start snap.m…
-
Probably related or duplicate to #12824
**What should the feature do:**
Allow to set multiple OSD pools for a single `CephObjectStore` and define target placement for these pools, so clients will…
-
We don't want to expose the /admin api on the public object-gateway endpoint, for this in native Ceph the workaround that is used is to dedicate admin endpoint to specific RGW instance that is interna…
-
tests/manage/rgw/test_host_node_failure.py::TestRGWAndNoobaaDBHostNodeFailure::test_rgw_host_node_failure is failing on IBM Power with below error-
` Error is Error from server (NotFound): pods "ro…
-
Update the steps of test case `test_rgw.py::test_rgw_unavailable` as mentioned in the [bz comment](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218190#c10)
-
We noticed that we don't receive any metrics from certain users anymore. When investigating the radosgw_usage_exporter I saw that `_get_rgw_users` only ouput maximum of 1000 users.
Apparently `/adm…
-
**Is this a bug report or feature request?**
* Bug Report
**Deviation from expected behavior:**
After cluster restart, the rook-ceph-rgw-ceph-objectstore-xxx pod was noticed to run into Cra…