-
[ePO issue 664](https://github.com/OP-TED/ePO/issues/664) discusses how to handle property inheritance in the generated OWL and SHACL shapes.
This is a new feature that can be implemented in mode…
-
- Having SHACL shapes https://qudt.org/2.1/schema/shacl/qudt is admirable
- However, they duplicate info from https://qudt.org/2.1/schema/qudt
Which is problematic for several reasons:
- terms ge…
-
Right now, we have defined the file format directly in the SHACL-shape of every data category. This makes it very hard to reuse same file formats across different shapes, like reuse same data formats …
-
Property shapes with the same `shacl:path` and different generated IRIs repeats twice or sometimes even 3-4 times in the Turtle spec. JSON-LD affected also.
For example, several property shapes rep…
-
I had no idea, but it turns out that you can define new validation types in SHACL with "constraint components": https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#constraints (I'm blaming W3C, the spec is pretty hard to un…
-
The ePO ontology produces SHACL with references to rdf:plainliteral, that is either a `xsd:string` or `rdf:langString` like in this example
```turtle
core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasLegalFormTy…
-
# Bug Report
## Describe the Bug
I am not sure what to expect here, but in the document https://github.com/eclipse-dataspace-protocol-base/DataspaceProtocol/blob/main/common/common.protocol.md
…
k00ni updated
1 month ago
-
When testing out rudof with the SkoHub shapes repo at https://github.com/skohub-io/skohub-shapes I ran into the follwoing problem:
```
~/git/skohub-shapes$ rudof shacl-validate -s skos.shacl.ttl t…
-
The term "shape" is used a lot in definitions:
```
Label: data product label shape
Label: data product description shape
Label: data product has policy shape
Label: data service security schema t…
-
I am playing a bit with the SHACL file from 4.0 beta. Some suggestions:
- the node shapes seem to have sh:targetClass pointing at themselves. But in that case they should also be instance of rdfs:C…