-
DILCIS Board must take a stand on how to deal with the SIARD interoperability issue of filepath reference for LOBs.
Reposting from DBPTK Issue, because this is the single most conflicting interoper…
-
Hi
although this question is not about the SIARD specification itself, it is about ZIP64 (which is used by SIARD) and the interpretation of the ZIP64 specification. As we (SFA, KOST (developer of K…
-
When transfering a database information into SIARD, there are sometimes issues and details that should be documented. These issues pertain to possible data losses or transformations that happen in the…
-
Review comment:
> Comments concern using SIARD when transferring and preserving databases. Having done preserving databases for about 40 years in Sweden we see a need and have a tradition of …
-
Review comment:
> 5.1 Database level metadata Why is “DatabaseProduct” not mandatory? This information is essential - especially when it comes to interpretation of datatypes. Could “databaseProduct…
-
In order to support hierarchical validation we need to record the dependencies between validation profiles. Consider a CITS profile that depends upon the base E-ARK IP specifications and the PREMIS CI…
-
Review comment:
> The specification is vague on how to handle databases with an associated external document container. More details on how to reference documents form data and how to express par…
-
Description:
SIARD Version is 2.1, file was produced through SiardGui 2.1.134. Database was MS SQL Server 12.
A SIARD validation with dbptk results in an unexpected error on requirement T_6.3-1…
-
DBPTK thinks that I do not have .siard extension and gives [ERROR].
G_4.1-5: [ERROR] : The ZIP archive must have the file extension .siard
Construction of the SIARD archive file [FAILED]
Doesn…
-
Description: Generated a file using DBPTK desktop. Contains 5 tables and the file is 92MB. When try to open file in DBPTK desktop a blue progress dot pulses on the open option but the file never loads…