-
Just wanted to set up an issue to track the status of [this draft](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-peabody-dispatch-new-uuid-format-04#name-uuid-version-7) so that if/when it's accepted, i…
Vlix updated
4 months ago
-
[RFC 4122](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peabody-dispatch-new-uuid-format-04.html#appendix-B.1) UUIDv6 Example: **1EC9414C-232A-6B00-B3C8-9E6BDECED846**
But in this library **NewV6** generate…
ygllq updated
6 months ago
-
BPO | [44920](https://bugs.python.org/issue44920)
--- | :---
Nosy | @serhiy-storchaka, @loganasherjones, @stevesimmons
*Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrat…
-
-
Didn't see this in the prior art section and i wonder if this spec tacles the same problems as the v6 not-official proposal did.
https://bradleypeabody.github.io/uuidv6/
Sorting by its raw…
-
Using a UUID as a PRIMARY KEY has [various performance problems](https://blog.koehntopp.info/2020/09/22/alter-table-for-uuid.html) however these are being addressed by newer versions of UUID ([UUIDv6 …
-
## Feature Request
I propose to add support for the new UUID versions (V6, V7, V8, Nil UUID, Max UUID) according to [draft-ietf-uuidrev-rfc4122bis-14](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ie…
-
> Continuation of separate #24 thread
**Question:**
Should we redefine UUID variant bits 111 (E/F) which are currently "Reserved for future definition." as per the original RFC 4122 Section 4.1.1 …
-
In section 4.3.3 (UUIDv6 Node Usage) of this specification, there is the following text:
> UUIDv6 node bits SHOULD be set to a 48-bit random or pseudo-random number. UUIDv6 nodes SHOULD NOT utiliz…
-
Thanks for the lib! Are there any plans to support a v6 UUID?
http://gh.peabody.io/uuidv6/
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-peabody-dispatch-new-uuid-format-00
I know it's an RFC right now, bu…