search

A-NZ-PEPPOL / A-NZ-PEPPOL-BIS-3.0

Australia-New Zealand extensions to the Peppol BIS 3.0 specifications
26 stars 22 forks source link

Example files not matching v1.0.4 rules #9

Closed phax closed 3 years ago

phax commented 3 years ago

The following rule is broken: [BR-CO-19]-If Invoicing period (BG-14) is used, the Invoicing period start date (BT-73) or the Invoicing period end date (BT-74) shall be filled, or both. Test: ((exists(cbc:StartDate) or exists(cbc:EndDate)) and not(exists(cbc:DescriptionCode))) or (exists(cbc:DescriptionCode) and (not(exists(cbc:StartDate)) and not(exists(cbc:EndDate))))

This files are affected:

phax commented 3 years ago

It works to just remove/comment the <cbc:DescriptionCode>432</cbc:DescriptionCode> part of the documents to make it work

dmaus2018 commented 3 years ago

Seems to affect AU Invoice.xml as well

phax commented 3 years ago

I disagree to you @dmaus2018:

    <cac:InvoicePeriod>
       <cbc:StartDate>2019-06-01</cbc:StartDate>
       <cbc:EndDate>2019-07-30</cbc:EndDate>
    </cac:InvoicePeriod>

is according to the rules.

dmaus2018 commented 3 years ago

Hi @phax If we add that description tag, it throws BR-CO-19; Does that mean description tag is not allowed ? BR-CO-19 rule statement doesn't say anything about Description. I noticed invoices coming to our access point have that description tag as well as startdate and enddate Ta

phax commented 3 years ago

The check means that either StartDate and/or EndDate OR DescriptionCode might be present but NOT both. So if you use DescriptionCode make sure to remove StartDate and EndDate.

jessie421998 commented 3 years ago

Thank you Philip and Deepesh! I double checked that the sample file 'AU Invoice.xml' has passed validation (v1.0.4).

The NZ team is working to update the rest of the sample files.
Let us know if other questions or issues. Chao