Open Hugh-Cai opened 1 year ago
Thank you for raising a more challenging task. Currently, I don't have a better solution. But it is worth further research.
I trained on resolution 64 for KTH dataset and have the same problem. The possible reason is that training is difficult if the resolution is too high; If the resolution is too small, it is difficult to extract more details; Perhaps 128 is a more suitable compromise. More research is needed.
Hi, Gao I find the input size is almost smaller than 128 in the paper. So, I take a training on my own dataset which are same expect for different input size (128, and 512), leading to different performance:
What causes this situation? Can you help me with the questions or give me some suggestions?
Thanks