AASJournals / AASTeX60

Version 6 of the LaTeX style files and documentation for authoring AAS Journal (AJ/ApJ) articles.
https://journals.aas.org/aastex-package-for-manuscript-preparation/
LaTeX Project Public License v1.3c
46 stars 26 forks source link

trackchanges, \edit# tracking issue #139

Open augustfly opened 2 years ago

augustfly commented 2 years ago
  1. The editors request that authors only use bold or bold-similar to highlight changes from version to version. They do not want to see any strikeouts or colorized replacements. Manuscript revisions sent with such text will be sent back to be converted to bold-only even if the authors used previously supported mode in AASTeX. In other words if you use AASTeX <6.3.1 then don't use trackchanges at all -- use \edit#
  2. Do not use \turnoffeditone, \turnoffedittwo, \turnoffeditthree \turnoffedit in AASTeX 6.3.1 -- they are completely broken as they delete text from the compiled PDF.
  3. Use \edit1 \edit2 \edit3 sparingly or not at all until we stabilize the functionality and editor preferences.
  4. This thread will track other concerns (including advocating for specific functionality).
augustfly commented 2 years ago

Some issues so far:

augustfly commented 2 years ago

Relevant discussion threads:

parkus commented 2 years ago

Building on this thread: I have also found that using \edit# will bold the text regardless of whether the trackchanges argument is specified in the class declaration.

A workaround in the interim is to redefine the command in your document header so that it does nothing

\renewcommand{\edit}[1]{}

(I'm not sure if this will work for any edit number or just \edit1.)

Here is an MWE:

\documentclass{aastex631}

\begin{document}
I wrote some stuff, and then the reviewer suggested I add \edit1{this other stuff.}

\end{document}

Despite the lack of trackchanges, "this other stuff" will still be bold in the output PDF.